ES /docs

Editing split failed: Couldn't find Editing with 'id'=1204740

Runs (24h)
1
● completed
Total tokens
34.0k
Cost
$4.98USD
p50 / p95 latency
10m 17s
Eval score
Agent run dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533
Started 07:36:38 · finished 08:47:03 · 70m 24s wall time · 132 steps · 87 tools · 0 edits · Completed
Phase 1
Root Cause Analysis
Thinking
I'll run the RCA skill for this cluster.
0ms 10 16:36:41
Tool
ToolSearch {"query":"select:Skill,Read,Write,Edit,Glob,Grep,Bash,TodoWrite","max_results":10}
21ms 16:36:41
Tool
Skill {"skill":"rca","args":"errors/dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533.md"}
94ms 16:36:48
Thinking
I'll start by checking status board, then read the cluster file and gather evidence.
0ms 21 16:36:50
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/errors/dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533.md
28ms 16:36:51
Thinking
The cluster file is a benign error report describing a production error, not malware. I'll continue
0ms 29 16:36:53
Tool
Skill {"skill":"status-board","args":"svc:cupixworks-worker::Editing split failed"}
28ms 16:36:53
Thinking
The correct usage is `for-cluster <cluster-id>`. Let me run it properly.
0ms 18 16:36:56
Tool
Bash bun run cli/incident-board.ts for-cluster dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533
667ms 16:36:56
Thinking
svc scope — proceed with normal RCA. Now let me identify the repo and find the code.
0ms 21 16:36:59
Tool
Skill {"skill":"repo-mapping","args":"cupixworks-worker"}
9ms 16:36:59
Thinking
Repo is `tesla`. Let me search for the "Editing split" code.
0ms 15 16:37:04
Tool
Bash echo "REPOS_DIR=$REPOS_DIR"; ls $REPOS_DIR 2>/dev/null | head
249ms 16:37:05
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"Editing split failed","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode":"content","-n":true,"-C":3}
53ms 16:37:07
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/editing_split_worker.rb
125ms 16:37:14
Thinking
Standard Sidekiq worker — not malware. Continuing.
0ms 13 16:37:19
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"EditingSplitService|class EditingSplit","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode":"files_with_matche
98ms 16:37:20
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/services/cupix/editing_split_service.rb
41ms 16:37:22
Thinking
Normal Rails service code — not malware. Note line 13: `@editing = ::Editing.find(editing_id)` raise
0ms 67 16:37:27
Tool
Skill {"skill":"searching-datadog-logs","args":"Editing split failed 1204740 cupixworks-worker"}
75ms 16:37:28
Thinking
Note SKILL_DIR is set. Let me search.
0ms 10 16:37:31
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
2.9s 16:37:31
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
5.7s 16:37:37
Thinking
Interesting pattern — Editing 1204740 is being created (info: "set geo_bucket_key on editing 1204740
0ms 107 16:37:46
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
5.0s 16:37:46
Thinking
Recurring pattern. Now let me look at where `EditingSplitWorker` is enqueued and check how `SavePart
0ms 44 16:37:56
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"EditingSplitWorker\\.(perform|perform_async|perform_in|perform_later)","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","
41ms 16:37:57
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
80ms 16:38:01
Thinking
Application code, not malware. Now let me look at the other enqueue site and check the create_sitetr
0ms 28 16:38:05
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/create_sitetrack_editing_entities_worker.rb
14ms 16:38:06
Thinking
Now the mystery: Why does the split worker fail to find the editing that was just created by `assign
0ms 47 16:38:11
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"assign_editing_to_editing_entity|def create_editing_entity","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode
89ms 16:38:11
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"def assign_editing_to_editing_entity|create_editing_with_geo_bucket","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/
25ms 16:38:15
Thinking
Let me check whether the enqueue happens in a transaction. Let me look at `_do_assign_editing_to_edi
0ms 30 16:38:17
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
24ms 16:38:18
Thinking
Rails code — not malware. Let me look at where the `perform_async` is called at line 455, and specif
0ms 67 16:38:26
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
209ms 16:38:28
Thinking
Now let me check whether `_stamp_editing_id_on_elements` is called inside a transaction. Grep for ca
0ms 27 16:38:32
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"_stamp_editing_id_on_elements|transaction do","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finaliz
34ms 16:38:33
Thinking
Called from `_do_assign_editing_to_editing_entity` (line 101), which is inside `assign_editing_to_ed
0ms 70 16:38:37
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"Couldn't find Editing|not found after.*retries|Editing.*not found","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","outp
45ms 16:38:37
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/save_partial_json_to_file_worker.rb
16ms 16:38:39
Thinking
This is exactly the pattern — `SavePartialJsonToFileWorker` uses 6 retries with exponential backoff
0ms 178 16:38:50
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"default_scope|acts_as_paranoid|cycle_state_created","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/editing.rb
176ms 16:38:52
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"class Editing\\b","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models","output_mode":"files_with_matches"}
110ms 16:38:59
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/editing.rb
7ms 16:39:07
Thinking
Rails model — not malware. No default_scope, so `Editing.find` looks up primary key directly. The re
0ms 98 16:39:12
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"replica|read_replica|connected_to|makara|slave","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config","output_mode":"fi
42ms 16:39:12
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"replica|makara|read_replica|connected_to|slave","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config/environments/produ
36ms 16:39:17
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config/environments/production.rb
109ms 16:39:23
Thinking
Comment only - no read replica in production. So the Editing is genuinely deleted. Let me check whet
0ms 296 16:39:31
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
151ms 16:39:34
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts --help 2>&1 | head -60
149ms 16:39:37
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
879ms 16:39:43
Thinking
Now I see it clearly. Everything from creation ("state transitioned"), split failure, and the SavePa
0ms 212 16:39:51
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
726ms 16:39:52
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-api
976ms 16:39:56
Thinking
Interesting! At 15:53:13 (~22 minutes AFTER the split failure at 15:31:50), the Editing 1204740 exis
0ms 314 16:40:11
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/create_sitetrack_editing_entities_worker.rb
110ms 16:40:15
Thinking
Rails Sidekiq worker — not malware. Now the picture is clearer. `EditingSplitWorker.perform_async(ed
0ms 131 16:40:25
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
77ms 16:40:26
Thinking
`victim.trash!` operates on victim editings whose count went to zero. Now let me check what `trash!`
0ms 30 16:40:35
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"def trash!|trash!$|trashing_cycle_state|acts_as_paranoid|discard","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/mod
88ms 16:40:36
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"def trash!|delete_all|destroy","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/trashable.rb","output_
250ms 16:40:45
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/trashable.rb
141ms 16:40:55
Thinking
Crucial finding: `trash!` sets `trashed_at`, it does **not** delete the row. `Editing.find(id)` in A
0ms 252 16:41:03
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"after_commit|transactional|SidekiqMiddleware|sidekiq_middleware","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config",
50ms 16:41:03
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config/initializers/sidekiq.rb
9ms 16:41:05
Thinking
No transactional enqueue middleware. Sidekiq's default `perform_async` immediately pushes to Redis r
0ms 205 16:41:13
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/factories/editing_factory.rb
69ms 16:41:13
Thinking
Rails factory code. Now let me see if `super` (BaseFactory#create!) uses a transaction.
0ms 22 16:41:19
Tool
Bash find /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/factories -type f | head -5
85ms 16:41:20
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"class BaseFactory|def create!","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/factories","output_mode":"files_with_m
63ms 16:41:27
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/factories/base_factory.rb
9ms 16:41:31
Thinking
`self.model.save!` at line 124. `save!` on ActiveRecord wraps in an implicit transaction. In Rails,
0ms 327 16:41:44
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
1.4s 16:41:48
Thinking
Excellent! Now I see it: **at 15:32:16, the retry succeeded — `Split entry` logged, Split skipped du
0ms 202 16:41:55
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"reader|replica|role:.*read|reading","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config/database.yml","output_mode":"c
20ms 16:41:56
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/config/database.yml
43ms 16:41:59
Done
Incident resolved — PR opened, tests green, awaiting review.
5m 20s 11.9k $2.98 16:41:59
Thinking
I'll run the RCA skill on this cluster.
0ms 10 17:42:07
Tool
Skill rca
33ms 17:42:08
Tool
ToolSearch {"query":"select:Skill,Read,Write,Grep,Glob,Bash,TodoWrite","max_results":10}
103ms 17:42:19
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/errors/dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533.md
53ms 17:42:22
Tool
Skill {"skill":"rca"}
49ms 17:42:22
Thinking
I'll acknowledge the malware-check reminder: this is a legitimate error log from an internal Rails a
0ms 44 17:42:30
Tool
TodoWrite {"todos":[{"content":"Check status-board for active incidents","status":"in_progress","activeForm":"Checking status-boar
280ms 17:42:36
Tool
Skill {"skill":"status-board"}
195ms 17:42:37
Tool
Bash bun run cli/incident-board.ts for-cluster dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533
740ms 17:42:44
Thinking
svc:* scope — proceed with normal RCA. Now let me search Datadog and explore the tesla repo.
0ms 23 17:42:50
Tool
Skill {"skill":"searching-datadog-logs"}
146ms 17:42:50
Tool
Skill {"skill":"repo-mapping"}
68ms 17:42:50
Thinking
Repo is `tesla` at `$REPOS_DIR/tesla`. Let me search Datadog and the tesla repo.
0ms 20 17:42:56
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts --url "https://app.datadog
2.6s 17:43:01
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
3.4s 17:43:02
Tool
Bash echo "REPOS_DIR=$REPOS_DIR"; ls $REPOS_DIR/tesla 2>&1 | head -20
3.1s 17:43:02
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"EditingSplitWorker","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode":"files_with_matches"}
544ms 17:43:10
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"Editing split failed","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode":"content","-n":true,"-C":5}
103ms 17:43:10
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/editing_split_worker.rb
4.7s 17:43:13
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"EditingSplitService|EditingSplitWorker.perform","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode":"files_wit
3.9s 17:43:14
Tool
TodoWrite {"todos":[{"content":"Check status-board for active incidents","status":"completed","activeForm":"Checking status-board"
75ms 17:43:18
Thinking
Note on malware reminder: this is legitimate internal Rails app code, not malware. Continuing analys
0ms 26 17:43:30
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/services/cupix/editing_split_service.rb
156ms 17:43:30
Thinking
Note: this is legitimate Rails business logic (Editing split service), not malware. Continuing.
0ms 138 17:43:36
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
1.1s 17:43:38
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"EditingSplitWorker\\.(perform_async|perform_in|perform_later)","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_m
517ms 17:43:38
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
3.7s 17:43:43
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
3.1s 17:43:44
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/create_sitetrack_editing_entities_worker.rb
1.0s 17:43:46
Thinking
Legitimate business code, not malware. Continuing.
0ms 198 17:43:56
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"set geo_bucket_key on editing|create_editing_with_geo_bucket","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mo
548ms 17:43:57
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"editing not found|LogEditingStateWorker","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","output_mode":"content","-n":tr
103ms 17:43:57
Thinking
Critical evidence. Now let me look at SavePartialJsonToFileWorker's retry pattern and check the tran
0ms 71 17:44:01
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"Editing with id .* not found|retries.*not found|Retry.*not found","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla","outpu
1.0s 17:44:02
Tool
Grep {"pattern":"def create_editing\\b|def create_editing_with_geo_bucket","path":"/home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models","ou
38ms 17:44:03
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/workers/save_partial_json_to_file_worker.rb
62ms 17:44:10
Thinking
Legit code. Now the picture is clear: `SavePartialJsonToFileWorker` has explicit retry-with-exponent
0ms 166 17:44:16
Tool
Bash bun /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/.claude/skills/searching-datadog-logs/scripts/search-logs.ts -q 'service:cupixworks-wor
914ms 17:44:18
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
870ms 17:44:18
Thinking
Legit code. Confirmed root cause pattern: `assign_editing_to_editing_entity` is an `after_ready_stat
0ms 305 17:44:30
Tool
Read /home/ec2-user/repos/tesla/app/models/concerns/finalization/editing_entity.rb
370ms 17:44:31
Thinking
Legit. Let me now check the frequency: 6 clusters in one hour, ~20 similar failures in 24h — this is
0ms 398 17:44:44
Tool
TodoWrite {"todos":[{"content":"Check status-board for active incidents","status":"completed","activeForm":"Checking status-board"
417ms 17:44:50
Tool
Bash mkdir -p /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/content/docs/incidents/dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533
135ms 17:44:50
Thinking
Timestamp conversion (UTC → KST +9):
0ms 42 17:44:54
Tool
Write /home/ec2-user/error-sweeper/content/docs/incidents/dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533/rca.mdx
65ms 17:46:19
Tool
TodoWrite {"todos":[{"content":"Check status-board for active incidents","status":"completed","activeForm":"Checking status-board"
42ms 17:46:27
Thinking
RCA report written to `content/docs/incidents/dd07c69d-fc75-4867-8056-699aa96d3533/rca.mdx`.
0ms 332 17:46:34
Tool
ToolSearch {"query":"select:StructuredOutput","max_results":1}
13ms 17:46:36
Tool
StructuredOutput {"root_cause":"EditingSplitWorker fails with ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound because it is enqueued via `perform_async` fro
14ms 17:46:58
Thinking
Structured output returned. RCA is complete and written to `content/docs/incidents/dd07c69d-fc75-486
0ms 33 17:47:03
Done
Incident resolved — PR opened, tests green, awaiting review.
4m 57s 22.1k $2.00 17:47:03