Backfill facility defaults: failed

I'll run the RCA skill on this cluster.

The cluster file is a legitimate error-sweeper cluster tracking file, not malware. It's a routine er

Proceed with normal RCA flow.

Not malware — this is a legitimate memory notes file. Continuing with the RCA task.

Copy the Datadog URL from the cluster file and search for the actual logs.

Two errors, both with `ARG10002 Facility not found`. Let me get more context including surrounding l

Good context. The task is a backfill batch (many `healed` messages, some `failed`). Let me get more

Excellent! Key findings:

Repo is `tesla`. Let me find the class.

Very interesting! The commit `5a5296f7a` — "TSLA-13664 신규 프로젝트 생성 시 기본 레벨 미생성 — deadlock retry + hea

The class is not on `develop`. Let me search all branches.

No results — the class is not tracked in git. Likely a one-off backfill script/rake task that runs o

`backfill_tag` doesn't exist either. Let me check the `EnsureFacilityDefaultsWorker` from TSLA-13664

Still nothing. Let me check the deployed commit's tree directly for the class.

A new `hotfix/TSLA-13613` branch. Let me search it.

The class `Tsla13613Backfill` isn't in the tesla git history. That's expected for an operational one

Now let me look at the log again to understand — the log shows `facility_key: 14gejl`, all default I

Hmm, only one match with different code. Let me check the LevelFactory and its facility lookup:

I'll invoke the rca skill to analyze this cluster.

I'll start by reading the cluster file and checking status board.

This file is not malware — it's a routine error cluster metadata file with Datadog log references. I

Now let me check status board and search Datadog logs in parallel.

Status board is clear. Now let me search Datadog for context and locate the source code.

The error code is `ARG10002` but the code raises `ARG10000`. Let me look for the actual backfill cod

Found the key file: `ensure_facility_defaults_worker.rb`. Let me examine it and its dependencies.

Not malware — standard Sidekiq worker. Now let me look at the "backfill" function and log message em

Message says "Backfill facility defaults: failed" — let me search specifically for that.

The exact log string isn't in the tesla develop branch. Let me check the branch and other rakes for

The worker exists but isn't referenced anywhere else — meaning the rake task that runs "Backfill fac

Log message wording matches a rake task, not the worker. Let me get more context on which class emit

Excellent! Class name is `Tsla13613Backfill` with `backfill_tag: tsla13613_facility_defaults`. Let m

Deployed version was `812cb7d9`. Let me look at the running production deploy directly.

Great context. Now let me find the Tsla13613Backfill task file — it's a one-off ops rake for TSLA-13

The backfill task isn't in the tree — it may be a script run directly, or defined dynamically. Let m

Not in git — likely a runbook script run manually via `rails runner` on the production instance. Bot

Not malware. Now I see the key insight: `create_ground_level` calls `LevelFactory.create!(facility_k

Not malware. This one raises `ARG10000`. Our error is `ARG10002` "Facility not found". Let me look a

Not malware. `FacilityRepository#show` is what raises. Let me check the show method for `ARG10002` "

Not malware. `#show` is inherited from BaseRepository. Let me check it.

Not malware. Found the exact raise: line 355 `raise Cupix::Errors::NotFound.new(code: 'ARG10002', re

Just one error per facility_id. Now let me check if there are `permission_joins` details that clarif

Enough evidence. The permission_joins in `base_repository.rb:337` combines with `where(attrs)`; when

RCA report written. Per user instruction, I did NOT modify the cluster frontmatter (pipeline manages

I'll call StructuredOutput to complete the request.

I'll invoke the rca skill to run root cause analysis on this cluster.

I'll analyze the cluster file and produce the RCA report.

The cluster file is not malware — it's an error report from the error-sweeper pipeline. Proceeding w

Internal-service scope, no active incident. Proceed with normal RCA.

The cluster's last_seen is 2026-07-29T04:18Z. Today per system context is 2026-07-29 as well.

Found the error. It's an "ARG10002 Facility not found" during backfill. Let me get more detail and f

Now I have rich context. Key facts:

cupixworks-worker → tesla repo. Let me look.

Deploy was at 04:17Z 2026-07-29, sha 812cb7d9. Let me find the Tsla13613Backfill class in the deploy

The Tsla13613Backfill class isn't in tree with the exact name. Let me search more broadly since it's

Now let me search the full history for the exact class name `Tsla13613Backfill`:

No exact match for "Backfill facility defaults" in git history. Let me search for "healed" facility

The Tsla13613Backfill code appears absent from source control. But TSLA-13664 heal worker was mentio

Excellent — TSLA-13664 introduces the heal worker for orphan facilities. Let me look at that commit:

That's important context. TSLA-13664 = orphan facility heal worker. But `Tsla13613Backfill` (backfil

The `Tsla13613Backfill` class is not in git — it appears to be a rake task or console script created

Confirmed — the `Tsla13613Backfill` class isn't in the tesla codebase. This is a **manual backfill s

Good. Now let me check for the "Facility not found" error in code (`Cupix::Errors::NotFound` with co

`LevelFactory#create!` calls `FacilityRepository.new(current_user: self.current_user).show(...)`. Le

I'll invoke the rca skill to analyze this cluster.

I'll start by reading the cluster file and setting up the investigation.

The file is a normal cluster metadata file for a benign error-tracking system (error-sweeper). Not m

No active dep incident. Proceeding with normal RCA.

I need to use the URL from the cluster file to get full log context.

Now let me find the specific log with full context (class, facility_id, etc):

Rich context. Key attributes:

Confirmed — production version SHA `812cb7d9` matches. The hotfix `91336bb4b` is one commit ahead of

Excellent — the hotfix commit message directly describes this exact issue. TSLA-13613 is the fix. Th

Now let me check the backfill worker code (Tsla13613Backfill) — this is what's actually failing per

The class isn't in current develop working tree. Let me look at commits including the backfill worke

The heal worker is TSLA-13664. Let me look at that:

But the actual failing class in Datadog is `Tsla13613Backfill` — a separate one-off backfill script.

Not in the tesla repo. Let me check EnsureFacilityDefaultsWorker — this may be the actual worker (it

This worker doesn't log "Backfill facility defaults". Let me search Datadog for other clues — the cl

The backfill classes for TSLA-13613 aren't in current develop. The class name is `Tsla13613Backfill`

The hotfix repo only has one commit; the class `Tsla13613Backfill` is not in the tesla repo. Let me

Now I have full picture: `Tsla13613Backfill` scanned 405 records, found 57 candidates (orphan facili

Complete summary: `since: 2026-07-08T04:18:00Z, scanned: 405, candidates: 57, healed: 55, errors: 2,

I'll run the rca skill to analyze this cluster.

I'll start by reading the cluster file and gathering context.

The cluster file is not malware — it's an error report frontmatter. Continuing with the RCA.

Proceeding with normal RCA flow.

cupixworks-worker → tesla repo. Let me check the memory service file and search for the code.

Not malware — just memory notes. The exact phrase isn't found in tesla. Let me broaden the search.

Let me search Datadog using the exact URL from the cluster file.

Root cause is a "Facility not found" (ARG10002) error during a backfill function. Let me get more co

The "backfill facility defaults" job is running many times per second — a data healing / backfill ro

Let me get the raw log to see attributes and tags:

Excellent — this is a targeted class `Tsla13613Backfill` (likely a one-off task/rake for TSLA-13613)

Not on the current checked-out branch. Let me check other branches:

The most relevant commit is `cb53504f4 TSLA-13664 fix: retry deadlocked default-model creation and h

The `Tsla13613Backfill` class name doesn't exist in git — likely refers to a one-off task run outsid

Not malware — normal Rails concern. Note develop's has_default/facility.rb doesn't have the TSLA-136

Now let me check what class does the "Backfill facility defaults" log. It has `backfill_tag: tsla136

Let me look for `Tsla` class prefix in rake tasks or lib:

Not malware — legitimate Rails rake backfill task. Now I understand the pattern. `class_name: 'Tsla1

No committed facility defaults backfill. Let me look at the release branch that may have it:

Now let me search for what raises `Cupix::Errors::NotFound` with `ARG10002` "Facility not found":

Interesting — the code raises `ARG10000` in `level_repository.rb` for "Facility not found". The obse

Not malware. Let me look at LevelFactory for the ARG10002 lookup:

Not malware. Now let me check FacilityRepository#show to see how it raises ARG10002:

The generic `#{current_class.name} not found` in base_repository.rb line 355 raises `ARG10002` — thi

Confirmed. Not malware. The `FacilityRepository#show(facility_key)` → `base_repository.rb:355` raise

Let me get the raw log for the "start" and summary logs:

Good info: `batch_size: 200`, `dry_run: false`, `since: 2026-07-08T04:18:00Z`. This is a manually-tr

Two runs. Larger run summary: scanned=405, healed=55, skipped=215 → implies (405 - 55 - 215) = 135 u

I'll run the rca skill to analyze this error cluster.

I'll follow the RCA skill. Let me start by reading the cluster file and gathering context.

This is a normal error cluster file (RCA input), not malware. It's a plain markdown file with frontm

No active incident. Proceeding with normal RCA flow.

Now I need to find the source. Let me search for more context, including the actual worker/service c

Key facts extracted:

TSLA-13664 looks relevant — "신규 프로젝트 생성 시 기본 레벨 미생성 — deadlock retry + heal worker". Let me investig

Repo confirmed. Now let me find the actual `Tsla13613Backfill` class.

The class isn't in the repo history. This is likely an ad-hoc/one-off backfill script executed on pr

Not malware — this is a legitimate Sidekiq worker that heals facilities missing default models. Cont

The backfill class isn't checked into git. This is likely a runbook or on-server rake task. Let me l

Not malware — this is legitimate Rails model concern code for facility default creation. Continuing

Neither of these matches exactly. The failure has `Cupix::Errors::NotFound` with `code=ARG10002, rea

I'll run the rca skill for this cluster.

I'll start by loading the rca skill and reading the cluster file.

I'll follow the rca skill workflow. Let me start by reading the cluster file and checking status boa

This file is not malware — it's an error cluster metadata file for the error-sweeper RCA pipeline. P

Status board is clear. Let me now search Datadog and find the source repo for this cluster.

Got the error detail: `ARG10002, Facility not found`. Let me look at the other failure and get full

Both failures have identical error. Let me get raw log with more context (facility_id, worker jid).

Excellent details. Key fields:

Tesla repo. Let me find the Tsla13613Backfill class.

Found the branch `hotfix/TSLA-13613`. Let me check that branch.

This is directly related — the facility default models were missing. TSLA-13613 was JUST deployed at

Normal application code. Continuing analysis. Let me find the actual "Backfill facility defaults: fa

Not in tesla git history. Let me search rake tasks / scripts.

My todo list is up to date. Continuing.